Immortality

I read an article about the quest for immortality in Scientific American and decided to use to see how I am on my quest.  According to the article there are four immortality narratives.   The most basic is staying alive.  While no one can stay alive forever, we can extend our lives. I chose to do this by eating a healthy diet and daily exercise. I think I can add another 20 quality years to my life by doing these simple activities.  The second narrative is resurrection - physically rising again with our bodies.  I do not believe in resurrection.  The third narrative is soul, "surviving as some kind of spiritual entity."   While no one is absolutely sure there is a soul, that is why it is called faith, I am following Pascal's wager and living my life to achieve an afterlife. If God does not exist, it does not matter how you wager, for there is nothing to win after death and nothing to lose after death. But if God does exist, your only chance of winning eternal happiness is to believe, and your only chance of losing it is to refuse to believe. As Pascal says, "I should be much more afraid of being mistaken and then finding out that Christianity is true than of being mistaken in believing it to be true." The fourth is legacy to leave an impact through children or our work.  I do not have children but as a teacher I have a major impact on the lives of children every day.  My hope is that they remember the wisdom I have passed on to them.

Will I achieve immortality? I can do what I can to extend my life and have faith that there is an afterlife or at least I will be remembered for the good things I have done.

Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old Boss

I recently finished Absolute Monarchs by John Julius Norwich, as history of the papacy.  It was very enlightening, more so since I am a Catholic.  Mr. Norwich is very objective in his writing, so we learn about great popes, the corrupt popes, and the average popes. It was interesting that through the middle ages most popes were ordained priests after they were elected priests.  Many popes were more interested in enriching their families then to shepherding their flocks.  Nepotism was common place until the 20th century.  The Renaissance popes built grand monuments and palaces for themselves but also added to the Vatican library.  There were a few forward thinking popes but most were conservative afraid of losing control of the papal states and power and influence over the kings of Europe.  Some were pawns of the kings of Europe.

How have things changed in the 21st Century?  Not much. Our present pope was the head of the Inquisition, which is now called the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith.  His duty was to ensure that the doctrines laid down by Rome were being enforced.  If they were not, the offenders were exiled to the hinterlands. The recent Vatican leaks show that there is still corruption in the Vatican. Cardinal Vigano had been making marked progress in his battle against corruption and cronyism as deputy governor in charge of financial reforms of Vatican City.  Last August, Vigano was suddenly appointed papal nuncio, or ambassador, to the United States. But Vigano felt that if he were moved out of Rome it would send the wrong signal—that anyone who fights the church’s corruption won’t get to do it for long.  He was moved anyway.

The more things change the more they stay the same.